🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are more and more allowing the far right to dictate the public discourse, according to a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this trend has unwittingly helped radical groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Two Decades of News Reporting

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six German newspapers.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core themes like integration and immigration, established parties progressively adjusted their messaging in response.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these ideas and signaled to the electorate that such stances were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by established political groups plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional groups were condemning the far right. "They still receive focus," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Across Europe

While the research was centered around Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to apply to nations across Europe.

"You see this a lot in European media," explained another researcher. "The far right says something and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At times, leaders have also toughened their language to align with that of the radical right.

In a recent interview, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable examples can be found throughout the continent, as politicians from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are talking about societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the radical right, despite research indicates that doing so leads voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The extent of data collected revealed that the impact of far-right parties had been progressive and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "However, when you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The study emphasized the necessity for established political parties to carve out their own discourses, particularly on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."